PHILOSOPHICAL PERSPECTIVE IN THE FORMATION OF MANAGEMENT PARADIGMS OF HYBRID ORGANIZATIONS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17721/2523-4064.2024/11-3/13Keywords:
institutional hybridity, institutional logic, hybrid organizations, management philosophy, postmodernism, adaptability.Abstract
B a c k g r o u n d . The article examines the phenomenon of institutional hybridity in the context of the formation of modern organization management paradigms. Special attention is paid to the philosophical understanding of the interaction of different institutional logics, such as social, commercial, and cultural, which determine the identity and strategies of hybrid organizations. The postmodern approach, which emphasizes ambiguity and complexity, allows us to consider hybrid organizations as adaptive systems that can respond to the rapidly changing conditions of the modern globalized environment.
M e t h o d s . This research employed a comprehensive array of methods, including philosophical analysis, comparative method, hermeneutic approach, and literature analysis. The interdisciplinary nature of these methods allowed for a deepened understanding of institutional logic and its pivotal role in shaping the management strategies of hybrid organizations.
R e s u l t s . The study showed that combining different institutional logics allows hybrid organizations to balance social and commercial goals through a selective combination of different approaches. Conflicts between logic turned out to be obstacles and potential sources of innovation that contribute to the development of adaptability in management. Hybrid organizations appear as systems constantly in a state of formation, rethinking their identity and mission.
C o n c l u s i o n s . Institutional hybridity in managing hybrid organizations is not just a functional requirement, but a conceptual basis for building new management paradigms. A postmodern approach helps organizations integrate different value orientations, ensuring flexibility and resilience in response to external challenges. This creates the basis for developing adaptive management models that consider both pragmatic and ethical requirements.
References
Appadurai, A. (1996). Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. University of Minnesota Press.
Aquinas, T. (2003). Commentary on Aristotle's "Politics" (O. Kisliuk, Trans.; 2nd ed.). Osnovy [in Ukrainian].
Battilana, J., & Dorado, S. (2010). Building sustainable hybrid organizations: The case of commercial microfinance organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1419–1440.
Besharov, M. L., & Smith, W. K. (2014). Multiple institutional logics in organizations: Explaining their varied nature and implications. Academy of Management Review, 39(3), 364–381.
Castells, M. (2007). Internet Galaxy: Reflections on the internet, business, and society. Valker [in Ukrainian].
Denis, J.-L., Ferlie, E., & Van Gestel, N. (2015). Understanding hybridity in public organizations. Public Administration, 93(2), 273–289.
Derrida, J. (2000). The Ends of Man. In K. Baynes (Ed.), After philosophy: End or transformation? (pp. 114–145). Chetverta Hvylia [in Ukrainian].
Habermas, J. (2014). Toward the Reconstruction of Historical Materialism. Filosofiya osvity, 2, 37–79 [in Ukrainian].
Heraclitus (2002). In V. I. Shinkaruk, E. K. Bystrytskyi, M. O. Bulatov, A. T. Ishmuratov, P. F. Yolon, G. P. Kovadlo, A. M. Kolodny, S. B. Krymsky,
V. S. Lukyanets, V. V. Lyakh, V. A. Malakhov, M. M. Moklyak, L. V. Ozadovska, N. P. Polishchuk, S. V. Proleev, Ya. M. Stratiy, V. G. Tabachkovskyi, & N. V. Khamitov (Eds.), Philosophical encyclopedic dictionary (p. 113). Abris. [in Ukrainian]. http://shron1.chtyvo.org.ua/Shynkaruk_Volodymyr/ Filosofskyi_entsyklopedychnyi_slovnyk.pdf
Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Harvard University Press.
Pache, A.-C., & Santos, F. (2013). Inside the hybrid organization: Selective coupling as a response to competing institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal, 56(4), 972–1001.
Prigogine, I. (1990). Time, dynamics and chaos: Integrating Poincare's "Non-Integrable Systems". Center for Studies in Statistical Mechanics and Complex Systems at the University of Texas-Austin; United States Department of Energy-Office of Energy Research; Commission of the European Communities. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/6390561
Skelcher, C., & Smith, S. R. (2015). Theorizing hybridity: institutional logics, complex organizations, and actor identities: The case of nonprofits. Public Administration, 93(2), 433–448.
Terepyshchyi, S., Dunets, V., & Kalach, D. (2018). Challenges of hybridity in transcultural identity: A case of displaced universities. Studia Warminskie, 55, 119–130.
ISSN 
ISSN 
