ENLIGHTENMENT AS A CHANGE IN THE WAY OF THINKING: NATURAL LAW JUSTIFICATION IN THE PHILOSOPHY OF I. KANT

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17721/2523-4064.2025/12-6/23

Keywords:

Kant, enlightenment, natural law, way of thinking, maxim, virtue, practical philosophy.

Abstract

B a c k g r o u n d . Kant's endeavour to comprehend the philosophical foundations and practical implications of the Enlightenment resulted in his formal concept of enlightenment as a change in the way of thinking. In developing this concept, Kant drew chiefly on his own interpretation of the philosophical tradition of natural law, while also drawing on the tradition of virtue ethics. The reconstruction of this concept enables the formation of how people tend to think and how to improve the way they think.

M e t h o d s . The study of Kant's philosophy demands the application of analytical and synthetic methods, encompassing his numerous distinctions while ensuring a comprehensive perspective. The employment of conceptual analysis has enabled the elucidation of the term "way of thinking", thereby unveiling its internal structure and logical connections. As Kant does not present a coherent concept of changing the way of thinking in a special study, the methods of rational reconstruction and modelling were used.

R e s u l t s . The article under scrutiny herein examines the Stoic sources of Kant's justification of the concept of enlightenment, namely natural law and the universal destiny of human beings. It is emphasised that Kant substantiated his own version of natural law, relying on and rethinking the traditions of the law of reason and the law of self-preservation within the framework of critical philosophy. The concept of natural law, as elucidated by Kant, is primarily characterised as an internal demand of reason. The article employs a rational reconstruction of Kant's original formal concept of enlightenment, modelling the stages of changing the way of thinking. This is achieved by taking into account both normative demands and internal obstacles. The employment of legal metaphors by Kant is elucidated, with the aim of demonstrating the correct utilisation of reason.

C o n c l u s i o n s . The Kantian concept analysed not only implies courage and the ability to think for oneself, but also a potentially endless process of improving one's way of thinking. This concept explains the correct use of reason when a person dares to abandon intellectual paternalism and begins to be consciously guided by the right maxims.

References

Brandt, R. (2007). Die Bestimmung des Menschen bei Kant. Felix Meiner Verlag.

Cicero, M. T. (1998). On the State. On Laws. On the Nature of the Gods (V. Litvinov, Trans.). Osnovy [in Ukrainian].

Deligiorgi, K. (2005). Kant and the Culture of Enlightenment. State University of New York Press.

Gregory, M. L. (2021). Kant’s Naturrecht Feyerabend, Achenwall and the Role of the State. Kant Yearbook, 13(1), 49–71.

Gressis, R. A. (2013). The Relationship Between the Gesinnung and the Denkungsart. In: S. Bacin, A. Ferrarin, C. La Rocca & M. Ruffing (Eds.), Kant und die Philosophie in weltbürgerlicher Absicht: Akten des XI. KantKongresses 2010 (S. 403–412). G. Reimer; W. de Gruyter.

Haakonssen, K. (1996). Natural law and moral philosophy: From Grotius to the Scottish Enlightenment. Cambridge University Press.

Kant, I. (1911). Gesammelte Schriften: Bd. 3. Kritik der reinen Vernunft (2. Aufl. 1787). G. Reimer; W. de Gruyter. https://archive.org/details

/kantsgesammeltes03imma/page/n7/mode/2up?view=theater Kant, I. (1911). Gesammelte Schriften: Bd. 4. Kritik der reinen Vernunft (1. Aufl. 1781), Prolegomena. Grundlegung zur Metaphysik der Sitten. Metaphysische Anfangsgründe der Naturwissenschaft. G. Reimer; W. de Gruyter. https://archive.org/details/kantsgesammeltes04kant/page/n5/ mode/2up?view=theater

Kant, I. (1913). Gesammelte Schriften: Bd. 5. Kritik der praktischen Vernunft. Kritik der Urteilskraft. G. Reimer; W. de Gruyter. https://archive.org/ details/kantsgesammeltes05imma/page/n5/mode/2up?view=theater

Kant, I. (1914). Gesammelte Schriften: Bd. 6. Die Religion innerhalb der Grenzen der blossen Vernunft. Die Metaphysik der Sitten. G. Reimer; W. de Gruyter.https://archive.org/details/kantsgesammeltes06imma/page/n5/mode/ 2up?view=theater Kant, I. (1917). Gesammelte Schriften: Bd. 7. Der Streit der Fakultäten. Anthropologie in pragmatischer Hinsicht. G. Reimer; W. de Gruyter. https://archive.org/details/kantsgesammeltes07kant/page/ii/mode/2up?view

=theater Kant, I. (1923). Gesammelte Schriften: Bd. 8. Abhandlungen nach 1781.

G. Reimer; W. de Gruyter. https://www.amazon.de/Immanuel-Kant- Gesammelte-Akademieausgabe-Abhandlungen/dp/3110014971

Kant, I. (1923). Gesammelte Schriften: Bd. 9. Logik. Physische Geographie. Pädagogik. G. Reimer; W. de Gruyter. https://archive.org/ details/kantsgesammeltes09imma/page/n5/mode/2up?view=theater

Kleme, G. (2024). Kant on the self-preservation of reason. Philosophical Thought, 2, 30–37 [in Ukrainian]. https://doi.org/10.15407/fd2024.02.030

Krieger, L. (1965). Kant and the crisis of natural law. Journal of the History of Ideas, 26(2), 191–210.

Merritt, M. (2009). Reflection, enlightenment, and the significance of spontaneity in Kant. British Journal for the History of Philosophy, 17(5), 981–1010.

Møller, S. (2020). Kant's tribunal of reason: Legal metaphor and normativity in the Critique of Pure Reason. Cambridge University Press.

Piche, C. (2015). Kantian enlightenment as a critique of culture. ConTextos Kantianos. International Journal of Philosophy, 2, 197–216.

Thielke, P. (2010). Denkart, Denkungsart. In G. Mohr, J. Stolzenberg, & M. Willaschek (Hrsg.). Kant-Lexikon (S. 375–377). G. Reimer; W. de Gruyter. Vacura, M. (2022). Three concepts of natural law. Philosophy and Society, 33(3), 601–620.

Willaschek, M. (2023). Kant und das projekt der aufklärung heute. ConTextos Kantianos. International Journal of Philosophy, 17, 125–133.

Published

2025-09-04

How to Cite

Panafidina, O. . (2025). ENLIGHTENMENT AS A CHANGE IN THE WAY OF THINKING: NATURAL LAW JUSTIFICATION IN THE PHILOSOPHY OF I. KANT. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Philosophy, 1(12), 32-37. https://doi.org/10.17721/2523-4064.2025/12-6/23

Issue

Section

PHILOSOPHY OF LAW OF IMANUEL KANT (ON THE 300TH ANNIVERSARY OF BIRTH)