MORALITY AND ECONOMY IN THE CONTEXT OF DIALOGUE BETWEEN THEORIES OF ENDOGENOUS DEVELOPMENT AND THEORIES OF "MODERNIZATION": ASPECTS OF RELATIONSHIPS

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17721/2523-4064.2025/13-13/14

Keywords:

morality, economy, theory of endogenous (homemade) development,

Abstract

B a c k gr ou nd . A pressing issue of contemporary economic development is the integration of indigenous (traditional) economies into the modern world. This challenge primarily concerns countries with underdeveloped economies that strive to overcome their economic difficulties by adopting the advanced practices of economically developed nations. In this context, the dialogue between the theories of indigenous economic development and modernization theories becomes particularly relevant. One of the most critical aspects of this dialogue is the exploration of the relationship between morality and economy, which are key spheres for the realization of the essential human capacities.

M e t ho ds . The theoretical and methodological basis of the study is the general principles of scientific knowledge, such as dialectics, objectivity, unity of historical and logical principles in the analysis of the relationship between morality and economics in the context of the dialogue between theories of original development and theories of "modernity". The comparative method and methods of analysis and synthesis of information from domestic and foreign scientific literature were also used. The study is characterised by the complementary application of the above methods, as well as the methodological synthesis of integrative and interdisciplinary approaches.

R esu l t s . The study has shown that in the modern world, indigenous cultures, while undergoing the modernizing influence of Western society, are capable of maintaining their endogenous character. Accordingly, the dialogue between theories of endogenous development and modernization theories is complex but holds significant promise. At the level of spiritual and economic culture in societies that adhere to tradition, the aspiration toward modernization naturally leads to the assimilation of national culture with, for example, that of Western Europe. Therefore, it is crucial to prevent the modernization process from acquiring a cynically bureaucratic nature, as this would adversely affect the preservation of national culture and societal identity.

C on c l us i on s . Morality and economics are organically interconnected and interdependent phenomena, which creates the need for a moral choice of priorities in the economic life of modern society and influences the formation of economic ethics. The process of modernisation of underdeveloped economies should be clear, transparent and filled with humanistic content.

References

Abdel-Malek, A. (1963). Orientalism in crisis. Diogenes, 11(44), 103–140. https://philpapers.org/rec/AABOIC

Bauman, Z. (2001). The individualized society. Polity Press. https://content.e-bookshelf.de/media/reading/L-3887089-9981724c04.pdf

Beck, U., & Williams, J. (2004). Conversations with Ulrich Beck. Polity Press. Beck, U., Giddens, A., & Lash, S. (1994). Reflexive modernization:

Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order. Polity Press. Bell, D. (1976). The cultural contradictions of capitalism. Basic Books. Bellah, R. N. (1957). Tokugawa religion: The values of pre-industrial Japan. The Free Press.

Berdinesen, H. (2018). Future generations and concepts of well-being. Filozofia, 73(4), 305–317.

Borisova, L. (2009). Values as a managerial tool. Organizacijų vadyba: Sisteminių tyrimų žurnalas / Management of Organizations: Systematic Research, 52, 7–19. https://www.vdu.lt/cris/handle/20.500.12259/36290

Bourdieu, P. (1983). The forms of capital. In J. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood.

Bozkurt, V., & Yesilada, B. (2017). Has capitalism lost its puritan spirit? Economics & Sociology, 10(2), 125–139. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2017/10-2/9

Braudel, F. (1984). The dynamics of capitalism. University of California Press.

Brown, T., & Ulijn, J. (2004). Innovation, entrepreneurship and culture: The interaction between technology, progress and economic growth. Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781845420550

Dediaeva, I. P., & Severyn-Mrachkovska, L. V. (2019). Philosophy of economy. In S. O. Tsymbalyuk (Ed.), Philosophy (pp. 314–336). KNEU Kyiv National University of Economics named after Vadym Hetman [In Ukrainian]. [Дедяєва, І. П. & Северин-Мрачковська, Л. В. (2019). Філософія економіки. У С. О. Цимбалюк (Ред.). Філософія (с. 314–336). Київський національний економічний університет імені Вадима Гетьмана] http://projects.dune-hd.com/bitstream/handle/2010/32404/pos_filos_19.pdf

Drucker, P. F. (2001). Management challenges for the 21st century. Harper Business.

Dubina, I. N., & Ramos, S. J. (2013). Entrepreneurship and national culture (according to Hofstede’s model). In E. G. Carayannis (Ed.), Encyclopedia of creativity, invention, innovation and entrepreneurship (pp. 634–638). Springer. https://surl.lt/zsofwt

Dubina, I., & Carayannis, E. (2016). Creativity, innovation, and entrepreneurship across cultures: Theory and practices. Springer.

Eisenstadt, S. N. (1967). Modernization: Protest and change. Prentice Hall.

Eisenstadt, S. N. (1968). Protestant ethic and modernization: A comparative view. Basic Books.

Eisenstadt, S. N. (1973). Tradition, change and modernity. Wiley. Freytag, A., & Thurik, R. (2010). Entrepreneurship and culture. Springer.

Gerschenkron, A. (1962). Economic backwardness in historical perspective. Frederick A. Praeger. https://surl.li/wtcvut

Giddens, A. (2007). Europe in the global age. Polity Press.

Hayek, F. A. (2002). Competition as a discovery procedure. Quarterly Journal of Austrian Economics, 5(3), 9–23. https://cdn.mises.org/qjae5_3_3.pdf

Hayek, F. A. (2022). The road to serfdom (S. Rachinsky, Trans.). Nash Format [In Ukrainian]. [Гаєк, Ф. А. (2022). Шлях до рабства (С. Рачинський, Пер.). Наш Формат].

Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. McGraw-Hill.

House, R., Javidan, M., Hanges, P., & Dorfman, P. (2002). Understanding cultures and implicit leadership theories across the globe: An introduction to Project GLOBE. Journal of World Business, 37(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1090-9516(01)00069-4

Inglehart, R. (1977). The silent revolution: Changing values and political styles among Western publics. Princeton University Press.

Kaplan, R. D. (2015, February 6). Asia’s rise is rooted in Confucian values. The Wall Street Journal. https://surl.li/wdnxei

Konecki, K. T. (2017). Contemplation for economists. Economics & Sociology, 10(3), 11–24. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2017/10-3/1

Kornai, J. (1990). The road to a free economy: Shifting from a socialist system – The example of Hungary. W. W. Norton & Company.

Kvedaravičius, J. (2006). Organizacijų plėtros valdymas. Vytauto Didžiojo universitetas.

Li, M. (2012). East Asian development model and foreign direct investment in China. China & World Economy, 20(6), 1–18.

Lipset, S. M. (1959). Some social requisites of democracy. American Political Science Review, 53(1), 69–105. https://doi.org/10.2307/1951731

Marx, K., Engels, F. (1978). Werke. Band 03: 1845–1846. Dietz Verlag. https://www.twirpx.com/file/3272597/

McFarland, K. R. (2009). The breakthrough company. Crown Business. McGrath, R. G., MacMillan, I. C., & Scheinberg, S. (1992). Cultural differences between entrepreneurs and non-entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 7, 115–135.

Mitchel, R. K., Smith, B., Seawright, K. W., & Morse, E. A. (2000). Cross-cultural cognitions and the venture creation decision. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 974–993. https://doi.org/10.2307/1556422

Morselli, A. (2014). Contemporary capitalism. Economics & Sociology, 7(2), 11–19. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2014/7-2/2

Parsons, T. (1971). The system of modern societies. Prentice Hall. Radziszewska, A. (2014). Intercultural dimensions of entrepreneurship.

Journal of Intercultural Management, 6(2), 35–47. https://doi.org/10.2478/ joim-2014-0010

Ridderstråle, J., & Wilcox, M. (2008). Re-energizing the corporation. Jossey-Bass.

Şansel, Ö., & Necdet, C. A. (2012). Inner voice of capitalism. Economics & Sociology, 5(2), 93–102. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2012/5-2/7

Scharpf, F. W. (1999). Governing in Europe: Effective and democratic? Oxford University Press.

Schwartz, S. H., & Sagiv, L. (1995). Cultural specifics in values. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 26(1), 92–116. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022195261007

Severyn-Mrachkovska, L. (2012). Charity and philanthropy as a manifestation of the interaction of morality and economics: A socio-philosophical analysis. Bulletin of National Academy of Culture and Arts Management, 1(3), 32–36 [in Ukrainian]. [Северин-Мрачковська, Л. В. (2012). Доброчинність та меценатство як вияв взаємодії моралі та економіки: Соціально-філософський аналіз. Вісник Національної академії керівних кадрів культури і мистецтв, 1(3), 32–36]. https://surl.li/nzwwua

Shapero, A., & Sokol, L. (1982). Social dimensions of entrepreneurship. In C. A. Kent, D. L. Sexton, & K. H. Vesper (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Entrepreneurship (pp. 72–90). Prentice Hall. https://archive.org/details/ encyclopediaofen0000unse_c2f5

Smith, A. (1776). An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations. Project Gutenberg. https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/3300

Steensma, H. K., Marino, L., & Weaver, K. M. (2000). Cooperative strategies. Journal of International Business Studies, 31, 591–609. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490924

Studwell, J. (2007). Asian model of management. Palgrave Macmillan. Studwell, J. (2014). How Asia works. Grove Press.

Swierczek, F. W., & Quang, T. (2004). Entrepreneurial cultures in Asia. Journal of Enterprising Culture, 12(2), 127–145. https://doi.org/10.1142/ S0218495804000075

The analects of Confucius (J. Legge, Trans.). (1861). https://classics.mit.edu/ Confucius/analects.html (Original work published ca. 500 B.C.E.)

The New Covenant of our Lord Jesus Christ. (1988). Exarchate Press [In Ukrainian]. [Новий Завіт Господа нашого Ісуса Христа. (1988). Видавництво Київського Екзархату]. http://osbm-buchach.org.ua/Bibliya/ Matey.html

Thompson, V. (2007). Ignited. Pearson Education.

Trompenaars, F., & Hampden-Turner, C. (1998). Riding the waves of culture. McGraw-Hill.

Tubadji, A. (2014). Was Weber right? International Journal of Manpower, 35(1/2), 56–88. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-08-2013-0194

Tubadji, A. (2025). Culture based development: Modelling cultural bias in economic choice. Edward Elgar.

Tubadji, A., Magnus, G., & Webber, D. J. (2023). Neo-Weberian approaches to China. Journal of Economic Issues, 57(1). pp. 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2023.2154528

Voitovich, R. (2010). European model of social development. Public Administration: Improvement and Development, 11. http://www.dy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=212

Vveinhardt, J. (2007). Vertybin e individo, organizacijo s ir visuomene s triada: Kongruencijo s paieško s organizacijoje. Ekonomika ir vadyba: Aktualijos ir perspektyvos, 2(9), 332–338. https://surl.li/ilhmrn

Weber, M. (1922). Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Religionssoziologie. Vol. I: Die protestantische ethik und der geist des kapitalismus. Mohr Siebeck. https://ttu-ir.tdl.org/handle/2346/47112

Weber, M. (1923). Gesammelte Aufsätze zur Religionssoziologie. Vol. II: Hinduismus und Buddhismus. Mohr Siebeck. https://ttu-ir.tdl.org/handle/ 2346/47174

Weber, M. (1930). The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism. Scribner’s.

Weber, M. (1968). The religion of China. Free Press. https://uk.1lib.sk/ book/839144/9fc026

Wu, Z. (2024). The theory of Chinese modernization. Palgrave Macmillan. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-981-97-8066-2_2

Žukauskas, P., Vveinhardt, J., & Andriukaitiene, R. (2018). Management culture and corporate social responsibility. IntechOpen.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-30

How to Cite

Severyn-Mrachkovska, L. . (2025). MORALITY AND ECONOMY IN THE CONTEXT OF DIALOGUE BETWEEN THEORIES OF ENDOGENOUS DEVELOPMENT AND THEORIES OF "MODERNIZATION": ASPECTS OF RELATIONSHIPS. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Philosophy, 2(13), 79-84. https://doi.org/10.17721/2523-4064.2025/13-13/14