MODERN PHILOSOPHICAL CONCEPTS OF INTERPRETING HUMAN PERSONALITY

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17721/2523-4064.2026/14-6/15

Keywords:

the concept of "personality", individuality, identity, nonlinear personality, self-identification

Abstract

Background. The concept of "personality" contains a diversity of semantic meanings and is associated with a number of concepts and approaches to the philosophical and methodological study of its meanings within various fields of science. Methods. The methodological perspective through which the research was conducted made it possible to attempt a description of a holistic view of the understanding of human personality in contemporary philosophy and modern scientific discourse. A reinterpretation of classical understandings of this concept as something stable and fixed was carried out. Results. Human personality is a multifaceted and ambiguous phenomenon. The problem of studying this issue lies in the fact that there is no single concept, approach, direction, method, or means that would provide a clear and unambiguous explanation of what personality is, what its properties and characteristics are, and so on. This concept is complex and multidimensional, since understanding a human being involves a combination of biological, social, historical, spiritual, and other dimensions. That is why, when speaking about human personality, we mean a combination of the external and the internal, freedom and responsibility, spirituality and religiosity, self-consciousness and how a person is perceived by others, as well as many other factors. Conclusions. Personality is considered an essential characteristic of a human being, which is formed and changes throughout life. The necessary conditions for the full and harmonious existence of a personality in the world and society include an understanding of various values, knowledge, morality, norms, and so on. However, since central concepts in understanding and explaining personality include such features as "liberty", "freedom", "choice", "responsibility" and "personal experience", the perception of a person as a certain personality – with the presence or absence of specific qualities and characteristics – may not coincide with how the person positions, identifies, understands, and perceives themselves as a personality in relation to the world and others.

References

Freud, Z. (2008). Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality. Psychology and Society. No. 4 (34), 45–91. [in Ukrainian]. https://file.lib.in.ua/pdf/freud-sigmund-try-narysy-z-teorii-seksualnosti.pdf

Kirilova S. (2002). Personality. Philosophical Encyclopedic Dictionary. Kyiv: Abrys, 457–458. [in Ukrainian] http://irbis-nbuv.gov.ua/ulib/item/ukr0011096 Koperlos, R.Yu. (2021, November 18). Man as a Nonlinear Personality. Man in the World of Spiritual Culture. Philosophical, Culturological, Moral-Aesthetic

and Religious Dimensions of Human Being in the World. Collection of Abstracts of the V All-Ukrainian Scientific and Practical Conference of Higher Education Students and Young Scientists. Rivne: National University of Water Management and Environmental Management, 27–29. [in Ukrainian] http://ep3.nuwm.edu.ua/id/eprint/22321

Koperlos, R.Yu. (2022). Understanding the Nonlinearity of Personality in Post-Nonclassical Rationality. Current Problems of Philosophy and Sociology, (34), 9-12. [in Ukrainian]. https://doi.org/10.32837/apfs.v0i34.1068

Ricker, P. (2002). The Self as Other. K.: Spirit and Letter. [in Ukrainian].

Sydorenko, L. (2017). Man as complexity: the problem of corporeality. Man in a complexity world. Sumy: University book, 31–46. [in Ukrainian]. http://www.philsci.univ.kiev.ua/biblio/humen_2017_.pdf

Zlobina, O. (2013). Social regulation of behavior in conditions of social instability. Kyiv: Institute of Sociology of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. [in Ukrainian]. https://isnasu.org.ua/assets/files/books/2013/soc_regulation.pdf

Giles, D. C. (2020). A Typology of Persona as Suggested by Jungian Theory and the Evolving Persona Studies Literature. Persona Studies, 6(1), 15-29. https://doi.org/10.21153/psj2020vol6no1art997

Roberts, B. W., & Yoon, H. J. (2022). Personality psychology. Annual Review of Psychology, 73, 489–516. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-020821-114927

Słowikowski, A. (2024). Kierkegaard’s Theories of the Stages of Existence and Subjective Truth as a Model for Further Research into the Phenomenology of Religious Attitudes. Philosophies, 9(2), 35. https://doi.org/10.3390/philosophies9020035

Published

2026-05-29

Author Biography

Ruslana Koperlos, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine

PhD (Philos.), Assistant

How to Cite

Koperlos, R. (2026). MODERN PHILOSOPHICAL CONCEPTS OF INTERPRETING HUMAN PERSONALITY. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Philosophy, 1(14), 37-41. https://doi.org/10.17721/2523-4064.2026/14-6/15