PHILOSOPHICAL ANALYSIS OF DIGITAL IDENTITY (BETWEEN AUTHENTICITY, PERFORMANCE AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17721/2523-4064.2026/14-12/15

Keywords:

digital identity, authenticity, performativity, subjectivity, artificial intelligence, digital culture, self-construction, social networks

Abstract

Background. The article explores the phenomenon of digital identity in the context of global transformations of modern society. At the same time, the relevance of the topic is due to the growing influence of digital technologies and artificial intelligence on the processes of self-construction of the individual. The article carries out a philosophical analysis of digital identity through the prism of the relationship between authenticity and performativity, and also demonstrates the main features of the modern interdisciplinary narrative. Methods. The methodological basis of the article is a complex of historical and philosophical methodology, which in turn is supplemented by hermeneutic, comparative and interdisciplinary approaches. This allowed us to interpret key concepts of identity and identify their transformation in the digital environment, as well as to trace the main impacts of the development of artificial intelligence on the self-perception of the individual. Results. The article establishes that digital identity is formed in the interaction between the desire for authenticity and the need for performative self-presentation. It is also shown that social networks and digital platforms contribute to the plurality of identities and at the same time strengthen their dependence on external assessments, algorithmic structures, etc. As a result, it is substantiated that artificial intelligence is not only a tool, but also an active factor in the formation of identity. Conclusions. Today, digital identity is a dynamic phenomenon that combines elements of individual freedom, social interaction and technological influence. It is not reduced to either the authentic "I" or a purely performative construction, but appears as their complex interaction. In general, it is possible to systematize key ideas and determine the main vectors of thought direction, namely, the existentialist concept of freedom of expression, the socio-dramaturgical model of identity as a separate role, the post-structuralist theory of performativity of identity, as well as modern approaches to digital culture, the problem of plurality and algorithmization of the subject were investigated. Further research could be aimed at analyzing the ethical and anthropological consequences of the digital transformation of the subject.

References

Butler, J. (1999). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. Routledge.

Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and Self-Identity: Self and Society in the Late Modern Age. Stanford University Press. Goffman, E. (1956). The Presentation of Self in the Everyday Life. University of Edinburgh.

Halchynskyi, D. (2025). Self-representation in the digital age: transformation of consciousness and the limits of authenticity. Bulletin of Humanities, 10. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17015540

Jung, C. G. (1928). Two Essays On Analytical Psychology. Bailliere, Tindall and Cox. URL: https://archive.org/details/in.ernet.dli.2015.218694/page/n7/mode/2up Mazur, M. (2024). Self-Identification of the Personality Within the Existential Discourse of Jean-Paul Sartre. Epistemological studies in Philosophy, Social

and Political Sciences, 7(1), 22-30 [In Ukrainian]. https://doi.org/10.15421/342412

Salih, S. (2006). On Judith Butler and Performativity. URL: https://www2.kobe-u.ac.jp/~alexroni/IPD2020/IPD2020%20No.2/Salih-Butler-Performativity-Chapter_3.pdf

Sartre, J.-P. (2022). Existentialism is humanism. Psychology and Society, 2(86), 49-65 [In Ukrainian]. https://doi.org/10.35774/pis2022.02.049

Zysman, J., & Nitzberg, M. (2020, August). Governing AI: Understanding the limits, possibility, and risks of AI in an era of intelligent tools and systems.

Berkeley Roundtable on the International Economy.

Published

2026-05-29

Author Biography

Oleksandr Nezdolia, Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv, Kyiv, Ukraine

PhD Student

How to Cite

Nezdolia, O. (2026). PHILOSOPHICAL ANALYSIS OF DIGITAL IDENTITY (BETWEEN AUTHENTICITY, PERFORMANCE AND ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE). Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Philosophy, 1(14), 72-76. https://doi.org/10.17721/2523-4064.2026/14-12/15