RATIONAL AND IRRATIONAL IN MODERN DEMOCRACY
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17721/2523-4064.2021/4-10/12Keywords:
democracy, rational, irrational, political responsibility, election, opposition, political will, faith, trustAbstract
The author gave reasons for the basis of theoretical analysis of modern democracy as a meeting of rational and irrational aspects. The author argues for the separation of institutionalisation component of democracy that grants rationality to the structures and processes of democratic systems. Irrational in democracy refers to the phenomenon of cultural order: political will, faith and trust. Results show an interdependency between rational and irrational in specific political phenomena and events of today.
References
Eisenstadt S. N. (2003). Paradox of democratic regimes: fragility and variability (II). Political studies, Volume 3, 81-95.
Kukuruz O. V. (2010). Political opposition in Ukraine and Poland: a comparative analysis. Scientific thought.
Malkina G. M. (2010). Political responsibility in democratic society (institutional aspect): a monograph.Publishing and printing center “Kyiv University”.
Mikhalchenko M. I. (2016). Theoretical and methodological basis of exploring the transformation of modern political institutes of Ukraine. Political institutes and processes. Scientific publication, Volume 1, 7-25.
Philosophy and political science as a component of modern social knowledge (theoretical and methodological aspects): a monograph (2011). Publishing and printing center “Kyiv University”.
Raikovskyi B. S. (2009). Elections and electoral systems in the context of transformational development of the Ukrainian society. Parliament’s publishing.
Stur J. J. (2003). Discovering democracy again. Political studies, Volume 5, 12-24. Weber M. (1990). Selected works. Progress.
Zubov A. B. (2013). Organic benefits of democracy. Political studies, Volume 2, 40-50.
ISSN 
ISSN 
