SUPPORT OF DEMOCRATIC POLITICAL SYSTEM BY SOCIETY AS A FACTOR OF GOVERNMENT EFFICIENCY

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.17721/2523-4064.2021/5-6/8

Keywords:

efficiency of governments, democracy, political system, political regime

Abstract

The problem of the level of support for governments and leaders as a factor of inefficient governance is analyzed. The consequences affect the character of the regime and reduce the level of support for democratic systems. Efficiency of governments, support of economic growth, provision of quality medical care, fight against crime affect the attitude of the population to democracy. The level of satisfaction with democracy is determined by fluctuations in economic indicators, the level of crime. Support for democracy remains relatively immune to changes in government efficiency. When developing performance indicators, it is recommended to use the "rule of four C": clarity (clearness); completeness; complexity and consistency. Indicators must be specific, real and, most importantly, quantifiable. The Government Performance Index is an index developed by the World Bank Group that measures the quality of public services, civil service, policy formulation, policy implementation, and confidence in the government's commitment to improving or maintaining these qualities at a high level. The World Bank publishes an index of government effectiveness among the other five global indicators of governance: accountability, political stability, quality of regulation, rule of law and control of corruption. These indices are considered measurements of management. The Public Administration Efficiency Index uses forty-seven variables (quality of bureaucracy, infrastructure for distribution of goods and services) from thirty-two sources, Global Insight business conditions and risk indicators. These variables are then combined using a component model. As an indicator, the index of public administration efficiency does not allow to identify specific problems of the country, to analyze specific solutions, but it is a tool for comparing countries, to measure the trend of improvement in a particular mode. Government efficiency is correlated with life satisfaction, GDP per capita, and education expenditures, which promotes democratic development.

References

Government Effectiveness // World Bank.]: http://info.worldbank.org/governance/ wgi/pdf/ge.pdf.

Tan Soo San, Kwok Andrew. Developing Key Performance Indicators for Effective Governance, [Електронний ресурс]: Tan Soo San, Andrew Kwok: http://www.docstoc.com/docs/39257669/Developing-KeyPerformance-Indicators-for-Effective-Governance

Aksoy, C. G., Eichengreen, B., & Saka, O. (2020). The political scar of epidemics. Institute of Labor Economics (IZA). https://www.iza.org/publications/dp/13351/the-political-scar-of-epidemics.

Hibbs, D. A., Rivers, R. D., & Vasilatos, N. (1982). On the demand for economic outcomes: Macroeconomic performance and mass political support in the United States, Great Britain, and Germany. The Journal of Politics, 44(2), 426-462.

Lewis-Beck, M., & Stegmaier, M. (2013). The vp-function revisited: A survey of the literature on vote and popularity functions after over 40 years. Public Choice, 157(3-4), 367-385.

Romero, V., Magaloni, B., & D ́ıaz-Cayeros, A. (2016). Presidential approval and public security in Mexico’s war on crime. Latin American Politics and Society, 58(2), 100-123.

Zhao, D. (2009). The mandate of heaven and performance legitimation in historical and contemporary China. American Behavioral Scientist, 53(3), 416-433.

Roskin, M. (2009). Countries and concepts: Politics, geography, culture (10th ed.). Pearson.

Yang, H., & Zhao, D. (2015). Performance legitimacy, state autonomy and China’s economic miracle. Journal of Contemporary China, 24(91), 64-82.

Morris, S. D., & Klesner, J. L. (2010). Corruption and trust: Theoretical considerations and evidence from Mexico. Comparative Political Studies, 43(10), 1258-1285.

Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2006). Economic origins of dictatorship and democracy. Cambridge University Press.

Mishler, W., & Rose, R. (2002). Learning and re-learning regime support: The dynamics of post-communist regimes. European Journal of Political Research, 41(1), 5-36.

Evans, G. & Whitefield, S. (1995). The politics and economics of democratic commitment: Support for democracy in transition societies. British Journal of Political Science, 25(4), 485-514.

Przeworski, A. (1991). Democracy and the market: Political and economic reforms in eastern Europe and Latin America. Cambridge University Press.

Mattes, R., & Bratton, M. (2007). Learning about democracy in africa: Awareness, performance, and experience. American Journal of Political Science, 51(1),192-217.

Córdova, A., & Seligson, M. A. (2010). Economic shocks and democratic vulnerabilities in Latin America and the Caribbean. Latin American Politics and Society,52(2), 1-35.

Mounk, Y. (2018). The people vs. Democracy: Why our freedom is in danger and how to save it. Harvard University Press.

Duch, R. M., & Stevenson, R. T. (2008). The economic vote: How political and economic institutions condition election results. Cambridge University Press.

Schwindt-Bayer, L. A., & Tavits, M. (2017). Clarity of responsibility, accountability, and corruption. Cambridge University Press.

Christopher Claassen and Pedro C. Magalhães. Effective Government and Evaluations of Democracy. Comparative Political Studies. 2021, Vol. 0(0) 1–26. © The Author(s) 2021.

Bratton, M., Mattes, R., & Gyimah-Boadi, E. (2005). Public opinion, democracy, and market reform in Africa. Cambridge University Press.

Dalton, R. J. (2004). Democratic challenges, democratic choices: The erosion of political support in advanced industrial democracies. Oxford University Press.

Easton, D. (1975). A re-assessment of the concept of political support. British Journal of Political Science, 5(4), 435-457.

Kaufmann, D., Kraay, A., & Mastruzzi, M. (2010). The worldwide governance indicators: Methodology and analytical issues. World Bank. Policy Research Working Paper no. WPS 5430.

Fukuyama, F. (2014). States and democracy. Democratization, 21(7), 1326-1340.

Przeworski, A., Alvarez, M. E., Cheibub, J. A., & Limongi, F. (2000). Democracy and development: Political institutions and well-being in the world, 1950–1990. Cambridge University Press.

Published

2021-12-29

How to Cite

Tkach, O., & Tkach, A. (2021). SUPPORT OF DEMOCRATIC POLITICAL SYSTEM BY SOCIETY AS A FACTOR OF GOVERNMENT EFFICIENCY. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Philosophy, 2(5), 55-63. https://doi.org/10.17721/2523-4064.2021/5-6/8