analysis, logic, logical knowledge, logical analysis, logical analysis of legal argumentation, argumentation, legal discourse


The article highlights the main problems that arise during the logical analysis of argumentation in legal discourse. Based on the author's approach to understanding the logical analysis of legal argumentation, the possibilities of overcoming them are proposed. According to the author, in the process of conducting a logical analysis of argumentation in legal discourse, the following interrelated problems arise: the first is a problem associated with an ambiguous understanding of the meaning of the word "logic" when it is used in research on legal argumentation (logic as a science or a certain logical theory, logic as a model, formal or informal logic); the second is a problem related to the existence of different interpretations of the concept of "logical analysis", as a result of which there is uncertainty in the use of methods and means of conducting such an analysis. The following possible steps to overcome these problems are proposed: firstly, in research on legal argumentation, when conducting a logical analysis of argumentation in legal discourse the meaning of the word "logic" should be noted (logic as a science or a certain logical theory, logic as a model, formal or informal logic), used in this context; secondly, in the process of such an analysis, clearly define the meaning of the used concepts "analysis", and "model"; thirdly, to proceed from the fact that taking into account that formal and informal elements are connected in legal thinking, the logical analysis of legal argumentation can be understood as the application of methods, techniques, means of all logical knowledge in solving its problems.


Beaney, M. (Mar 19, 2014). Analysis. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta (ed.). Retrieved June 07, 2022 from http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2015/entries/analysis/

Beaney, M. (2000). Conceptions of Analysis in Early Analytic Philosophy. Acta Analytica, Volume 15. Issue 25, 2000: 97-115.

Beaney, M. (2003). Susan Stebbing on Cambridge and Vienna Analysis. F. Stadler (ed.), The Vienna Circle and Logical Empiricism: Reevaluation and Future Perspectives, Kluwer Academic Publishers. Printed in the Netherlands. 339–350.

Black, M. (1932), 'Philosophical Analysis', Proc. Aris. Soc. 33 (1932-3): 237-58.

Broekman J.M., Fleerackers F. (2017). Legal Conversation as Signifier. Edward Elgar Publishing Limited, UK: 3–7.

Legal Discourse across Cultures and Systems. (2008). Edited by Bhatia V.K., Candlin C.N., Engberg J., Hong Kong University Press, 340 p.

Peirce, C. S. (1931) The Basis of Pragmaticism. The Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce 8 volumes, edited by Charles Hartshorne, Paul Weiss, and Arthur W. Burks. (Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1931–1958; volumes 1–6 edited by Charles Harteshorne and Paul Weiss, 1931–1935; vols. 7–8 edited by Arthur W. Burks, 1958). – 1: 294.

Petrina, S. (2018). Methods of Analysis. Logical Analysis. Retrieved June 17, 2022 from https://www.academia.edu/39292093/Logical_ Analysis?email_work_card=thumbnail

Philosophical Encyclopedic Dictionary. (2002). Head of editorial board. V.I. Shinkaruk. K.: Abris, 742 p. [In Ukrainian].

Prakken H. (2005). AI & Law, logic and argument schemes. Argumentation 19: 303-320.

Rey L., Brousselle A., Dedobbeleer N. (2011). Logic analysis: testing program theory to better evaluate complex interventions. Can J Program Eval. 2011 January 1; 26(3): 61–89.

Russell, B. (1988). Essays on Language, Mind, and Matter, 1919-26. The Collected papers of Benrand Russell; Volume 9. Edited by John G. Slater with the assistance of Bernd Frohmann, 720 p.

Waismann, F. (2015) What is logical analysis? Translated from German Y.V.Shramko for: Waismann F. Was ist logische Analyse? The Journal of Unified Science (Erkenntnis). Vol. 8, No. 5/6. 1940: 265-289. Actual Problems of Mind. Philosophy Journal. Ed. Yaroslav Shramko. No. 16. Kryvyi Rih: 97–122. [In Ukrainian].

Williams, R. G. A. (1981). Logical analysis as a qualitative method II: Conflict of ideas and the topic of illness. Sociology of Health and niness Vol. 3 No. 2, 1981: 165-187.

Wole´nski, J. (2010) Formal and Informal in Legal Logic. Approaches to Legal Rationality. Editors Gabbay Dov M., Canivez P., Rahman Sh., Thiercelin A. Logic, Epistemology and the Unity of Science. Vol. 20. Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg London New York, 2010: 73 – 88.




How to Cite

Shcherbyna, O. (2022). ON THE QUESTION OF LOGICAL ANALYSIS OF ARGUMENTATION IN LEGAL DISCOURSE. Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Philosophy, 1(6), 59-62. https://doi.org/10.17721/2523-4064.2022/6-11/13